Wednesday, March 31, 2010

GFC

While GDP certainly decreased during the GFC, Australia avoided sliding into an official recession. And while the unemployment rate rose (reaching a high of 5.8% in June 2009), those that retained employment actually experienced an overall increase in disposable income.Many Australians are actually in a better position now than before the downturn – what with significantly lower interest rates (currently at 4%, compared to 7.25% at the start of September 2007) and greater national disposable income (estimated by IBISWorld to reach $194,500 in the March 2010 quarter compared to about $181,000 million in late 2007).Add to this lower fuel-prices (now at US$80 per barrel compared to US$145 per barrel in mid-2008) and it's not surprising that household spending has been relatively strong over 2009-10.

Where to from here?

Average Australian households remain better off now than before the GFC and the first home owner boost encouraged many Aussies to enter the mortgage market – meaning we are just as indebted now as pre-GFC. Interest rates, fuel and electricity prices have all risen and many Australian families will again feel the pinch this year and onwards.Nonetheless, conditions are forecast to continue to improve, with IBISWorld projecting that slow economic growth in the March 2010 quarter will be replaced by solid growth for the remainder of the year, as households continue to spend and businesses join the fray.IBISWorld also expects the unemployment rate to continue to trend downwards and, barring any reversal of the improving trend internationally, the Australian economy will remain strong for the foreseeable future.

Friday, March 26, 2010

John Edwards of Residex speaks

The markets across Australia are indicating that they have passed the first peak in a normal part of a growth cycle. For most capital cities this means that we will see a slowing in the rate of growth (but still growth) during autumn and winter and a move back to higher rates of growth in the second part of the growth cycle.

This second phase or part of the growth cycle is usually longer and stronger than the initial growth period. The cycle has moved to being more normal, with upper cost areas of the market now leading the way forward. This is as one should expect as confidence among the ranks of our executive and upper management groups become stronger. It will flow on to other areas as corporate profits improve and there is lower unemployment and some wages growth.

Slowing is evident from the number of slightly negative growth numbers in the month of February for houses. The relatively strong performance in the unit market is evidence that investors have become much more active.

Here are the house and unit market statistics for February 2010.

Houses

Growth

Growth

Area

Median value

Feb 09 to Feb 10

10 year average

ACT

$501,500

9.45%

10.74%

Melbourne

$547,500

16.32%

10.16%

Brisbane

$469,000

6.52%

11.81%

Sydney

$634,000

13.28%

6.62%

Perth

$481,000

2.00%

11.67%

Hobart

$362,500

5.20%

11.98%

Darwin

$501,500

11.20%

11.28%

Adelaide

$400,000

7.95%

10.48%

Units

Growth

Growth

Area

Median Value

Feb 09 to Feb 10

10 year average

ACT

$394,000

7.84%

10.98%

Melbourne

$422,000

16.39%

9.85%

Brisbane

$357,500

3.10%

10.36%

Sydney

$444,500

10.41%

6.00%

Perth

$391,000

7.27%

11.08%

Hobart

$277,000

9.01%

12.50%

Darwin

$410,500

17.02%

11.09%

Adelaide

$306,000

8.01%

11.57%

Darwin houses are at last taking a breather and the growth for the month was for the first time negative in more than a year. Its rental yield remains the highest of all capital cities and will cause further investor interest which will continue to drive prices but at a lower level given the cost of property which is now relatively high by comparison to the other opportunities. The cost of an unit investment here is now only very marginally lower than in both Sydney (8%) and Melbourne (3%).

Graph 1: Major Capital City Trends


Graph 1 Major Capital City Trends clearly shows that the market is now softer than it was in September/October 2009.

The auction clearance rate in Sydney last week was approximately 65% while the clearance rate in Melbourne was in the 80% range. The impact of the RBA to increase interest rates has been more noticeable in Sydney but is a reasonable outcome given the higher cost of housing and the larger mortgage position for most when you consider that Sydney has been more expensive over a longer period. The momentum and confidence of Melbourne property buyers in a city which is growing strongly is likely to carry its growth phase for longer than in Sydney. However, both cities are exhibiting a slowdown as we move into winter. In both capitals investors are active in the unit market and prices are moving forward.

Our other cities are also exhibiting a softening but it is not as noticeable as in the two majors (see Graph 1). Again, this result is probably an expression of the lower impact of unaffordability and the RBA´s move on interest rates. (see Graph 2 Minor Capital Cities Trends).

Graph 2: Minor Capital City Trends


I have recently been reading suggestions and arguments about a price bubble in Melbourne forming.

I can see no evidence of this. Yes, houses are too expensive across Australia but that position is unlikely to change for at least a decade as it will take that length of time for governments to correct the stock shortage issues.

Further our population needs to expand to satisfy the fundamental needs of a growing resource sector. Add to this – the recent breaking of the drought and it is clear that Australia is in very good shape with the population more likely than not to see growth in wages, and reductions in unemployment than anything else. Add to this – a banking network that is strong and has the capacity to continue to lend to this sector and needs to, to maintain profits and we have a recipe for moderate to good total returns from our housing assets. Please note that I speak of total returns as the affordability issue will lead to renting becoming more normal than in the past and creating moderate capital growth, but at the same time causing rentals to rise.

But I digress a little. The RBA interest rate increases are having a slowing affect and the data is clearly showing that the rate of growth is moving back a little. This in itself points to a "bubble" being avoided as the growth rate would need to be increasing for there to be the potential of any major problem. One last point on this; our more than 170 years of data tells us that capital growth rates in the last 60 years are less each cycle and hence as property becomes more expensive, bubbles become harder to create. Having said that, we have to bear in mind, any long period of moderate growth with excessive bank lending with higher leverage being allowed or encouraged can lead to problems if the economic circumstance of the country turns down.

Our banks are well controlled and governed so a rapid adjustment to our housing values to make them affordable looks very unlikely.

With the market moving to a normally quieter period during winter, it is a good time to identify opportunities. For me winter is the best time to purchase as there is less competition in the market and sellers at this time are usually more anxious. You probably have a better opportunity to negotiate that bargain, particularly in Melbourne.

" target="_blank">http://www.residex.com.au/
View all articles by John Edwards

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

new banks entering the market

The decision by Credit Union Australia and AMP Bank to slash variable interest rates on home mortgages is good for the property market and will spur competitive activity, industry experts have said.The move by the two lenders came as Westpac chief executive Gail Kelly reportedly told a private briefing the bank would continue to raise interest rates due to cost pressures despite political pressure from Canberra.Credit Union Australia announced a 25 basis point cut in its variable rate to 6.37%, putting its products well below the interest rates offered by the big four banks. The closest competitor is NAB at 6.74%."We agree with the Treasury Secretary that the banking sector has become more concentrated over the last few years. There is a crying need for more competition and we are taking an active step in driving that competition," chief executive Chris Whitehead said in a statement."At the end of the day our profits go to our customers, not shareholders, in the form of investment in more competitive products and services. We are already a leader in the delivery of great service – this reduction in our SVHL rate means we are keen to take a leadership position in the products we offer as well."The statement comes as the property market is heating up. AMP Bank cut its rates late last week to 6.27%, while Aussie Home Loans also continues to finalise a $1 billion funding program in a return to the industry. Additionally, Macquarie Bank issued nearly $500 million worth of low-doc loans earlier this week.CommSec chief economist Craig James says he was a little surprised by the move, but says it makes sense as more players fight for the lower-end of the market."I think it's a move which has grabbed a lot of attention and I feel CUA will win a little bit of market share out of it. When you see Macquarie getting into the game again with low-doc loans, I think it shows there are more players coming into the market.""Economically speaking, it isn't a surprise, and if it's true that the banks are starting to gouge, the barriers to entry will remain high and give these lenders somewhere to move. There is a new context for the new players, and it's a good thing for the market which may make the banks watch their backs a little more."SQM Research founder and Advisor Edge property researcher Louis Christopher says the broad message of these cuts indicate the market is moving into a more competitive state, indicating a good time for investors to enter the market."The good news for borrowers is that there is now a lot of choice, and it's merely a case of doing your homework on these sorts of things. Certainly the expectation is that rates will continue to rise rather than fall, and people need to take that into their outlook. Also consider it may be a competitive deal now, but rates are going to rise no matter what.""But certainly in terms of the fact there is some competition, it is a good thing for the broader economy and borrowers, and has the potential to encourage other lenders and encourage greater growth."

Monday, March 15, 2010

Iron ore and world economy instability

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao not only warned the world of a possible return to recession, but was subject to impassioned pleas by steel makers over the enormous price rises looming in iron ore. The Australian economy depends more than any other in the world on the Wen Jiabao forecast and the iron ore strategic discussions.Whether we have a global recession will depend in part on whether the world cost of money rises substantially as the US, European and other governments step up their borrowing. In turn, that will partly depend on how much of the global money demand China can fund.But when it comes to iron ore pricing, it is China that caused the problem and Wen Jiabao has made the first moves that may lead to a big fall. The spot market for iron ore is double the 2009-10 contract prices, so the Chinese are looking at a truly enormous rise in costs, which will flow right through the Chinese economy. That spot iron ore price increase was mainly driven by incredible spending by the Chinese on infrastructure and dwellings as part of their response to the global financial crisis. In turn, that forced the Chinese steel mills to pay big prices on the spot iron ore market to gain material to satisfy the demand.A lot of the Chinese infrastructure spending was very productive, but a vast amount was wasted. The Chinese have built empty blocks of apartments, roads and rail that they will not need for years.This took place because the bulk of the capital expenditure was undertaken by local governments. Imagine what would happen if our local councils or state governments had the ability to borrow virtually unlimited amounts of money. Almost certainly they would spend it to satisfy local vested interests. The Chinese behaved exactly as you would expect equivalent bodies in Australia to do.According to JPMorgan, Chinese local governments were responsible for some 80 per cent of the capital spending and therefore dominated demand for our iron ore and are the main drivers of the price rises. It is also a force fuelling overall inflation in China.Even though it is the wasteful spending that is causing the problem, reversing the policy will be hard. But Wen Jiabao has taken an important first step removing the guarantees that enabled the local councils to borrow. In theory at least, the central government will then have a much bigger say over what takes place, but slowing the economy means many jobs will be lost.The stance of BHP is that annual iron ore price talks are just too disruptive, but a switch to spot prices would see the price sky rocket. Gradually, Rio Tinto and Brazil's Vale are coming to a similar view although they are sensitive to the Chinese demand for certainty.But one way or another, iron ore pricing is going to be much more orientated to the spot price and/or other short term price mechanisms.If Wen Jiabao is successful in curbing the expenditure of the local governments, then we will see a significant fall in the demand for iron ore late in 2010 or 2011, assuming current tasks are completed. Such forecasts have been made in the past and have been wrong as the demand for iron ore just keeps rising. But Wen Jiabao's prediction of a possible global recession is unprecedented.Both BHP and Rio Tinto believe that the Chinese growth story will not be a straight line graph and will have big variations. We will need to watch the curbs on Chinese local government work. And if the Chinese do pull back, Australia will bear a lot of the short term pain.

This article first appeared on Business Spectator.